The important thing to remember is that the tool is there and should be used to help you achieve the shot you had in mind when you first took it. If someone chooses to abuse it and produce a lousy image then that’s their choice, but it doesn’t make HDR itself the culprit. HDR is just a technique on the way to a good image, nothing more. In fact, I use them quite extensively but my goal is always to show something that might otherwise not have been there if not for multiple exposures, and I’ll use whichever tool helps me achieve that end in the easiest way possible. In this case I took the hand blended approach because I wanted maximum control over which elements are drawn out of a specific exposure, but that’s not to say that I don’t use HDR software such as HDR Efex or Photomatix. The above image is an HDR that I shot it with three exposures, two stops apart and then hand blended them through layer masks in Photoshop. On occasion even a heavily processed HDR is OK provided it suits the scene or helps to evoke a feeling, but it can’t compensate for a lousy starting point. Therefore, if people simply took better pictures to begin with, they wouldn’t have to reduce themselves to such trickery. Most often, HDR images are given this exaggerated treatment simply to compensate for a poor composition or boring subject. Nowhere does it say that the image must look over processed or unrealistic, it’s simply an ugly side effect because HDR software allows it. HDR is simply the process of taking multiple exposures to extend the dynamic range in an image of a particular scene. Photography sites are absolutely littered with over processed, unrealistic and downright foul looking HDR images and because of people (like myself) that complain about such a thing, we’ve begun to think that it’s this evil force that must be eradicated from the photography world. The reason this question exists in the first place is that over time a certain stigma has gotten attached to HDR because of people recklessly abusing it. Installing & Using Capture One Pro styles and profiles (.pdf).As I comb through various forums on architecture or landscape photography, a recurring question keeps popping up: “Is it technically bad to use HDR?”.Manual Install Styles folder (set of 44 styles),.Interior HDR Warm Detailed (Yellowish Cast).The List of Raztrend Interior HDR Styles: Please contact me if you need the Styles for the legacy versions 8.0, 9.0, and 10.0.The styles do not work with RAW files, because the program do not allow apply the profiles twice.ĬAPTURE ONE PRO v11, v.11.1, v.12, v.20, v21, v22ĬAPTURE ONE PRO (FOR SONY) v.12, v.20, v21, v22ĬAPTURE ONE PRO FUJIFILM v.12, v.20, v21, v22ĬAPTURE ONE PRO FOR NIKON v.20.1, v.21, v22ĬAPTURE ONE STUDIO v.12.1, v.20, v21, v22 !!! First convert RAW file to JPEG, TIFF or PNG. The styles give you the effect in just one second, and use never seen before HDR algorithms.There are 2 variants: 100% and 70% Opacity, cause Capture One Pro do not support the layers, based on input profiles. You can use these styles for Real Estate and Travel agencies, Hotel Business, Shopping Centers Advertisements, Catering Business, Creative Retouch, Video Enhancements, Film Grading and much more. Get a breathtaking HDR from a single Interior shot without halos and posterization in one click. Please use Manual install of the styles
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |